Rapscallion
May 3, 02:30 PM
That is a bit to expensive for me, I have to stay on a $200 budget.
blaster_boy
May 2, 04:31 PM
You might want to start by reading this (http://www.thesitewizard.com/archive/creditcards.shtml) and googling a bit more around to get up to speed about this.
I'm only a beginner in these things, but accepting creditcards of your own, you do need to be PCI DSS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard) compliant methinks.
Paypal or Google ? Why not both ?
IMHO you would be best developing the website with a payment gateway, and let the thirdparty take care of processing the creditcards / paypal / google checkout.
Especially if you are not yet clear about the whole setup and how it will work.
From what I read in your post, setting up the website, using a shopping cart, linking in to the payment gateway and generating the receipts : that seems like a big piece of work if you develop that yourself - to me it sounds like magento or another e-commerce solution could do most of what you need.
I'm only a beginner in these things, but accepting creditcards of your own, you do need to be PCI DSS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard) compliant methinks.
Paypal or Google ? Why not both ?
IMHO you would be best developing the website with a payment gateway, and let the thirdparty take care of processing the creditcards / paypal / google checkout.
Especially if you are not yet clear about the whole setup and how it will work.
From what I read in your post, setting up the website, using a shopping cart, linking in to the payment gateway and generating the receipts : that seems like a big piece of work if you develop that yourself - to me it sounds like magento or another e-commerce solution could do most of what you need.
SideStepSociety
May 3, 11:18 PM
Very strange. My guess is you'll see a custom build update fairly soon, like the MBP's got.
FireSokar
Mar 31, 09:37 PM
Exciting news. Also april fools jokes on march 31st aren't exactly what I'd call bright. Hopefully it's legit!
The us isn't the only country that reads this website. It is the 1st overseas allready.
The us isn't the only country that reads this website. It is the 1st overseas allready.
gugy
Oct 26, 01:37 PM
If its not announced by the week before thanksgiving we won't see it until at least MWSF.
yep, I agree. We have 1 month to hope so!:D
and I do think a special event will be announce to introduce it.
I wish it comes on the same week of the Zune just to kill those bastards!
yep, I agree. We have 1 month to hope so!:D
and I do think a special event will be announce to introduce it.
I wish it comes on the same week of the Zune just to kill those bastards!
iJohnHenry
Mar 1, 06:28 PM
How are the acoustics? ;)
calderone
Mar 10, 10:34 PM
You are reading into this a bit too much.
What Apple is referring to in the TN is that xinetd/inetd were deprecated as a means for users/admin and 3rd parties to launch daemons. Instead you should use launched.
That doesn't mean that Apple cannot use them as a means for launching and maintaining their own services. And indeed they are. The implementation noted in the Network Services Admin PDF is starkly different from how launchd is used.
What Apple is referring to in the TN is that xinetd/inetd were deprecated as a means for users/admin and 3rd parties to launch daemons. Instead you should use launched.
That doesn't mean that Apple cannot use them as a means for launching and maintaining their own services. And indeed they are. The implementation noted in the Network Services Admin PDF is starkly different from how launchd is used.
thejadedmonkey
Oct 12, 12:18 AM
2) Pages and Keynote (and it seems the "Lasso") are all targeted at the non-experienced computer user. Unfortunately, for the most part, that is the exact opposite audience who use spreadsheets.
I use excel to view my schedule. So do all my friends. I also use it for basic accounting.
I use excel to view my schedule. So do all my friends. I also use it for basic accounting.
OdduWon
Oct 26, 09:14 PM
This is just another one of apples patent's that they own so if someone wants to use it, they have to pay ;)
The Catalyst
Mar 30, 01:06 PM
Interesting little write up from yesterday:
"Spirit and JailbreakMe Creator Says Apple May Have Infiltrated The Dev Team" (http://www.cultofmac.com/spirit-and-jailbreakme-creator-says-apple-may-have-infiltrated-the-dev-team/88495)
"Spirit and JailbreakMe Creator Says Apple May Have Infiltrated The Dev Team" (http://www.cultofmac.com/spirit-and-jailbreakme-creator-says-apple-may-have-infiltrated-the-dev-team/88495)
Lord Blackadder
Mar 9, 01:14 PM
And if that mobjority decides that they want to take all the wealth of a certain group of people, that's their right to do? Since they have a majority? It's pretty easy to get support from a majority of people to take other people's money and distribute it to them. It's just not moral. Your position is that individuals have zero moral, legal, or otherwise claim to the wealth that they themselves work for/earn?
I don't think we're ever going to have a shortage of wealthy and powerful people; even authoritarian government have their share of plutocrats. I also question the notion that the acquisition of wealth is always assumed to have been legitimately "worked for" or "earned". ENRON, Madoff, the banks during the credit crunch...
At any rate, you're putting words in my mouth. We all collectively decide how to govern ourselves, and it's not always the case that a simple majority is enough to implement changes to the status quo. Also, it has been demonstrated time and time again that a small number of wealthy and powerful people can get their way in the face of overwhelming opposition from less wealthy and powerful people. It cuts both ways. You seem to be trying to characterize any increase in taxes on the rich as a form of theft perpetrated by the rest of the nation; that's a very twisted take on the concept of taxation.
In the end, your attempt to create sympathy for the wealthy rings hollow.
I don't think we're ever going to have a shortage of wealthy and powerful people; even authoritarian government have their share of plutocrats. I also question the notion that the acquisition of wealth is always assumed to have been legitimately "worked for" or "earned". ENRON, Madoff, the banks during the credit crunch...
At any rate, you're putting words in my mouth. We all collectively decide how to govern ourselves, and it's not always the case that a simple majority is enough to implement changes to the status quo. Also, it has been demonstrated time and time again that a small number of wealthy and powerful people can get their way in the face of overwhelming opposition from less wealthy and powerful people. It cuts both ways. You seem to be trying to characterize any increase in taxes on the rich as a form of theft perpetrated by the rest of the nation; that's a very twisted take on the concept of taxation.
In the end, your attempt to create sympathy for the wealthy rings hollow.
jettredmont
Oct 4, 02:52 PM
Most (if not all) new cell phones in America have built in GPS as a result of an FCC mandate for Enhanced 9-1-1 capability in mobile devices. Apple may simply be taking this required expense and turning it into a way to get more value in their device by linking it with a built in camera/iPhoto/GoogleMaps. This certainly seems like one of those "why didn't anyone else do that?" sort of (in retrospect) obvious moves that Apple is great at.
Well, someone (or rather, many someones) else have done that on the device side already:
http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/03/hidden_gps_photo_feature_on_th.html
I actually thought this was more widespread (cell phones tagging GPS location), but the page linked above says that Sanyo was the first to offer this in the US, last March. So, hmm.
The other approach used for this purpose is to time-synch (within reason) a handheld GPS tracker and your camera's clock, then run software afterwards which plots the pictures on the GPS trail from the tracker. This has been around for ages, but is about five steps beyond what the average Joe would be able to do to enjoy space-mapping of pictures.
Still, aside from sites like Flickr that display the GPS data, there's not much use for it yet. This is where Apple's classic whole-widget approach would pay off: make it easy to get the data into your photos, make it easy to see the data visually, and make it easy to search for the data via Spotlight et al.
Anyway: has anyone tried entering the Latitude/Longitude EXIF info in a picture, import it to iPhoto, and see what happens?
Well, someone (or rather, many someones) else have done that on the device side already:
http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/03/hidden_gps_photo_feature_on_th.html
I actually thought this was more widespread (cell phones tagging GPS location), but the page linked above says that Sanyo was the first to offer this in the US, last March. So, hmm.
The other approach used for this purpose is to time-synch (within reason) a handheld GPS tracker and your camera's clock, then run software afterwards which plots the pictures on the GPS trail from the tracker. This has been around for ages, but is about five steps beyond what the average Joe would be able to do to enjoy space-mapping of pictures.
Still, aside from sites like Flickr that display the GPS data, there's not much use for it yet. This is where Apple's classic whole-widget approach would pay off: make it easy to get the data into your photos, make it easy to see the data visually, and make it easy to search for the data via Spotlight et al.
Anyway: has anyone tried entering the Latitude/Longitude EXIF info in a picture, import it to iPhoto, and see what happens?
dmw007
Sep 6, 10:31 AM
Now replace work with school, and you have me... :rolleyes:
Sorry to hear about that ham_man.
Fortunately for me I am at school typing this on an iMac G5 (can't stand the brand-new-but-still-crappy Dells).
Sorry to hear about that ham_man.
Fortunately for me I am at school typing this on an iMac G5 (can't stand the brand-new-but-still-crappy Dells).
RebelScum
Apr 18, 10:55 AM
seems like apple is using the same modus operandi "tick-tock" as intel :cool::apple:
What a staggering coincidence. :cool:
What a staggering coincidence. :cool:
bella92108
Mar 31, 01:00 PM
yeah, i totally understand what you're saying. android definitely does a lot more straight out of the box than the iphone does. but i guess for me, if i had an android device i'd really like to be able to flash some really cool builds and kernels a lot of the guys at xda-dev release (like we all used to do on the old winmo days) that way i don't have to worry when the manufacturer quits releasing updates after ~6 months and i get stuck on an old os. i just hate the fact those manufacturers are trying to prevent that type of community from doing their thing.
Well that's kinda hypocritical posting in an Apple forum. Apple tries 100x harder to prevent users from jailbreaking than Android\Manufacturers do try to prevent rooting\modding.
Either way, I like current technology, so I don't worry about updates after 6 months. I replace my computers every 6 months, and my phones as well. This was one of the reasons I defected from Apple's phones, got tired of waiting for a one-a-year product cycle for a phone that wasn't even the latest and greatest technology.
Well that's kinda hypocritical posting in an Apple forum. Apple tries 100x harder to prevent users from jailbreaking than Android\Manufacturers do try to prevent rooting\modding.
Either way, I like current technology, so I don't worry about updates after 6 months. I replace my computers every 6 months, and my phones as well. This was one of the reasons I defected from Apple's phones, got tired of waiting for a one-a-year product cycle for a phone that wasn't even the latest and greatest technology.
Chaszmyr
Sep 12, 02:29 AM
I was in high school at the time. Some friends and I were sitting around a table, waiting for school to start, and another kid walked up and said "tell me you know what the %&@ is going on" and then proceeded to explain what had happened.
NewSc2
Oct 8, 10:52 PM
T-Mobile is an independent network. It and Cingular have rented infrastructure to one another at various times in the past to mutually help with each other's coverage, but T-Mobile is a real mobile phone operator. (It's what used to be Voicestream.)
I'm not entirely sure why people keep propogating this myth. It makes no sense on the face of it.
T-Mobile in my area rents its airtime on Cingular's network. This is coming from 2 friends, one who works for T-Mobile and one works Cingular
I'm not entirely sure why people keep propogating this myth. It makes no sense on the face of it.
T-Mobile in my area rents its airtime on Cingular's network. This is coming from 2 friends, one who works for T-Mobile and one works Cingular
Yvan256
Mar 17, 02:52 PM
I ordered one, they sent me two.
benhollberg
Mar 16, 09:23 PM
I just tried the Apple store again. No answer, I think they blocked my number because I call so much, maybe if they do that.
paricha
May 4, 12:42 PM
I had the same problem with my brand new MacBook Pro(2011). I took it to the Genius Bar along with my Numa Nano. After trying it on a number of different MacBooks, we found that the problem was on all the new MacBooks(2011). The laptops from 2010 saw it fine. So Apple did something different. The Apple genius sent corporate support a note on it. I hope it is just an OS update fix. If you plug in everything and reboot your computer, it should seen it.
ErikAndre
Jan 16, 06:00 AM
It will be this year. Most likely WWDC, along with a new refreshed, redesigned Nehalem Mac Pro (no kidding, another one will be out then). Don't listen to the others. I think Apple is holding off till this date.
eawmp1
Sep 10, 04:43 AM
Ugh...I put things in my closets I don't want to see out. And as I a, somewhat of a pack rat, that baby's stuffed.
StefSSU
Mar 9, 09:03 AM
Hi, need a little help from the web guru's.
So my site has a gallery page, with a bunch of images. I've used css to get border-radius, reflections, etc. The css reflections however don't render in all browsers, Firefox being the most important one. So as a graceful degradation I added a box-shadow to make the images look better in Firefox/Opera. Comparing Safari and Firefox/Opera, this works perfectly - reflection / no shadow in Safari, and shadow / no reflection in Firefox/Opera.
Google Chrome on the other hand, even though it uses webkit decides to render the box-shadow despite there being no -webkit- prefix. Is there any way to have the box-shadow display in FF/O but not in Chrome? The shadow kind of ruins the reflection.
The website is temporarily hosted here - costantini.mw gallery (http://f3-preview.host-ed.net/costantini.mw/Gallery/gallery.html)
While we're at it, the site is unfinished but some feedback on other pages and the design would be appreciated.
Cheers guys,
Stef
So my site has a gallery page, with a bunch of images. I've used css to get border-radius, reflections, etc. The css reflections however don't render in all browsers, Firefox being the most important one. So as a graceful degradation I added a box-shadow to make the images look better in Firefox/Opera. Comparing Safari and Firefox/Opera, this works perfectly - reflection / no shadow in Safari, and shadow / no reflection in Firefox/Opera.
Google Chrome on the other hand, even though it uses webkit decides to render the box-shadow despite there being no -webkit- prefix. Is there any way to have the box-shadow display in FF/O but not in Chrome? The shadow kind of ruins the reflection.
The website is temporarily hosted here - costantini.mw gallery (http://f3-preview.host-ed.net/costantini.mw/Gallery/gallery.html)
While we're at it, the site is unfinished but some feedback on other pages and the design would be appreciated.
Cheers guys,
Stef
spicyapple
Oct 11, 08:35 PM
Sounds good. :) What about Numbers? I pray they don't dumb it down like Pages, please!
No comments:
Post a Comment